domingo, 10 de mayo de 2015

The origin of the universe

The origin of the universe from the water ice.


Author; Rogelio Pérez Casadiego

This theory says that the universe originated in a solid body of water (ice), which step of the solid state to a gaseous state, a process known as sublimation, this solid body to the sublime gives rise to what we know as the space, then the sublimation originated a rotation movement, (sublimation creates a torque effect in the bodies) this movement causes that this gas is condensed, and the water appears in liquid form, this water was increasing the speed of their rotation movement gradually, up to accelerate this mass of water, causing the heat and light (All sufficiently heated body emits electromagnetic radiation in the visible spectrum), and this light ionizes the water molecules in the universe. This ionization that suffers from the water molecule in all levels of energy by the acceleration of the mass of water causes an expansion in the vacuum of the universe, what we know as the space.

Keywords;

Molecule of ion negative of hydroxyl, ion hydrogen atoms, water ice. Dark matter, plasma.

Introduction;

This article presents a new theory on the origin of the universe, which explains that the universe originated of water ice, which after a physical process known as phase transition, it is passed Solid state to the gaseous state, process known as sublimation, and then to the liquid state process known as condensation then experiment an acceleration in the mass of water radiating energy and ionizing their molecules, converting the water gas that filled the early universe into two kinds of plasma and.

This hypothesis has antecedents in the old time the pre-socratic philosopher and scientist Thales of Miletus, this referred to the idea that everything was made of water, giving importance to the movement[i].

The scientific theory teaches that a mass that accelerates will have to radiate energy, and the best candidate to accelerate and radiate energy, is the water because of their molecular combination the oxygen and the hydrogen, can be used as a raw material, to form all the elements of the earth and the universe, as explained by the Doctor William A. Fowleren in his writing the elements can be transmuted[ii], moreover  the percentage of the mass of the water molecule, explains perfectly 100% of matter in the universe"
New origin of universe model pours water on Big Bang theory; A new model in which the cosmos is filled with a “quantum fluid” suggests that there was no Big Bang – and could explain the origin of two mysterious components of the universe.[iii]

A swedish physicist critic of the theory of the big bang and Nobel prize winner called Hannes Olof Gösta Alfvén believed the problem with the Big Bang was that astrophysicists tried to extrapolate the origin of the universe from mathematical theories developed on the blackboard, rather than starting from known observable phenomena. He also considered the Big Bang to be a scientific myth devised to explain creation.[iv]

The singularity of  the Big Bang theory, comes out of the math of Einstein's theory of general relativity, which describes how mass warps space-time, and another equation (called Raychaudhuri's equation) that predicts whether the trajectory of something will converge or diverge over time. Going backward in time, according to these equations, all matter in the universe was once in a single point — the Big Bang singularity.

But that's not quite true. In Einstein's formulation, the laws of physics actually break before the singularity is reached. But scientists extrapolate backward as if the physics equations still hold, said Robert Brandenberger, a theoretical cosmologist at McGill University in Montreal.

There are other problems brewing in physics — namely, that the two most dominant theories, quantum mechanics and general relativity, can't be reconciled.[v]

Einstein had shown in 1915 as his theory could explain the progress of the anomalous perihelion of the planet Mercury without any parameter arbitrary. In the same way, in an expedition of 1919 led by Eddington confirmed the prediction of general relativity for the diversion of starlight by the Sun during the total solar eclipse of may 29, 1919[vi] . But not to mention the disagreements by the data shown[vii], this confirmation was made with the atmosphere of by middle   which the water crystals at the top of the atmosphere produce a similar effect, and also the discovery of water in mercury[viii], in the entire solar system and beyond[ix], could show the same effects, leave the theory of relativity and everything that comes from her very weakened. Apparently we see a castle built on sand.

This theory also talk that the universe rotates due the effect of torque produced by the sublimation of water ice, and the scientist have said; “The universe was born spinning and continues to do so around a preferred axis – that is the bold conclusion of physicists in the US who have studied the rotation of more than 15,000 galaxies. While most cosmological theories have suggested that – on a large scale – the universe is the same in every direction, these recent findings suggest that the early universe was born spinning about a specific axis”[x]

In the journal Nature came out in the following work that talk of the sublimation: “Here we present a sublimation heat engine, which can convert temperature differences into mechanical work via the Leidenfrost effect. The rotational motion of the dry-ice loads is converted into electric power by coupling to a magnetic coil system. We extend our concept to liquid loads, generalizing the realization of the new engine to both sublimation and the instantaneous vapourization of liquids. Our results support the feasibility of low-friction in situenergy harvesting from both liquids and ices”[xi].

Any new theory of the origin of the universe will have to answer hypothetically some mysteries of science as dark matter and dark energy, so it presented several concepts on these mysteries.

In astrophysics and cosmology physics is called dark matter to the hypothetical matter that does not emit enough electromagnetic radiation to be detected with current technical means, but whose existence can be deduced from the gravitational effects it causes in visible matter, such as the stars or galaxies, as well as in the anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background present in the universe[xii].

In line with this theory of a universe originated from the water, the water crystals comply perfectly with the characteristics of the dark matter; invisibility for telescopes, the effects of gravitational lenses and anisotropy[xiii].

There are also some ideas about what dark matter could be, called, Wimps and Axions, first there are several experiments without being able to find them, and the second (axions) the theory that predicts the existence of this particle in practice is not met. “The Dirac-mass chaos eventually destroys the exotic surface state,”
magnetic monopoles or of axions.[xiv]

Another concept is on the expansion of the universe, there is currently a scientific explanation, which proposes another explanation of the expansion of the universe, which was published in the journal natural that refers to the expansion of the mass of the atoms.[xv].

To explain the acceleration of the expansion of the universe, astrophysicists have invoked dark energy – a hypothetical form of energy that permeates all of space. A popular theory of dark energy, however, does not fit new results on the value of the proton mass divided by the electron mass in the early universe, the professor of astronomy of the University of Arizona, Rodger Thompson finds that a popular alternative to Albert Einstein's theory for the acceleration of the expansion of the universe does not fit newly obtained data on a fundamental constant, the proton to electron mass ratio[xvi].


A cosmological model with a large scale primordial rotation term of this order can give an accelerating universe mimicking a dark energy term."[xvii].

“Water is made of discrete, individual molecules, which interact with each other according to the laws of quantum mechanics, but liquid water appears continuous and flowing and transparent and refracting,” explains Ted Jacobson, a physicist at the University of Maryland, College Park. “These are all ‘emergent’ properties that cannot be found in the individual molecules, even though they ultimately derive from the properties of those molecules.”[xviii].

Materials and methods

The method to perform this research was the method analytical and synthetic, because the method of scientific evolution should be mixed, both for the discovery to science instruction, which is we use two species of method.

Results;

This theory teaches that; the universe was originated from a water ice (The ice has the characteristic of having three spatial dimensions and once that we see today), in which suffers a physical process known as phase transition that causes a change in this matter, passing of state solid to gas, a process known as sublimation, it gives rise to what we know as the vacuum, then the sublimation originated a rotation movement, sublimation creates a torque effect in the bodies (according to this theory is the cause by which all the matter in the universe rotates), forming a water fog, ) this movement causes that this gas is condensed  turning to the liquid state, then in this liquid water presents a movement of rotation, which is increasing up to accelerate and to make rotate on its own axis. 

which begins to radiate energy, this energy radiated in the beginning of the universe, generated very high temperatures (According to this theory is the thermal radiation (CMB)), changing this water mass into a gas which expands throughout whole universe in its origin, The increased acceleration of matter in space begins to raise the level of energy of the atoms, and there begins this high energy to turn into photons (All sufficiently heated body emits electromagnetic radiation in the visible spectrum) Causing all kinds of ionization by photons according to the level of energy generated, Producing the first ionization potential.



Photoionization producing atoms (H) and free radicals (OH), Also as the energy increased by the acceleration this water gas is assaulted by the photons of high energy (rays gamma), and the water molecules are ionized by the absorption of light UV of high energy resulting in the loss of electrons from the molecules of water generating 2 kinds of plasma; the first is formed of the hydrogen atoms (+H), and second formed by the molecule of (-OH), This ionization that suffers from the water molecule in all levels of energy, originates the expansion of the matter(according to this theory is the expansion that the universe experiment in its beginnings, this expansion of the water molecule in the vacuum of the universe originated the space, which is why this space is not completely empty, but that is an expansion of the water molecule in the vacuum of the universe. ).

We can also say that there are three kinds’ expansions of the molecules of water according to the level of energy, and therefore also three kinds of properties in the same matter, according to the ionization potential that was subjected to water molecules.

The matter was divided into 2 ; The first  composed of  (O), (OH)and (-OH), was formed what we know today as the dark matter and dark energy, which constitutes 95% of the totality of the matter in the universe, and which formed water clouds, ice water and liquid water in the universe, And the second composed of  hydrogen  (H)and atoms (+H) was formed clouds, stars, galaxies and the rest of astronomical structures that at present are observed, that constitutes 5 % of the matter of the universe.



Conclusions;

As a conclusion we can say that the universe originated from something called water ice, responds better many of the mysteries that today have in problem the theory of the big bang.

We can also say that the origin of light in the universe, which according to this theory is product of the radiation energy of the accelerated matter.

This theory teaches that the angular momentum that gave rise to the rotational movement of the mass in the universe was the sublimation of water ice. This movement of rotation in the universe can be explained by the effect of torque produced by the sublimation, of a universe originated from ice water (rigid body).

The material in the universe was ionized by photons in all levels of energy, in proportion to the energy levels produced by the acceleration of the mass of water, and according to this different energy the ionizations the matter was divided principally, in hydrogen atoms (H) and molecules (OH).

We can also conclude that in the universe there is a vacuum originated from the sublimation of ice that causes all things in the universe, and the space is caused by the expansion of the water molecule to be ionized. It is in this kind of space where given the existence of things in the universe.


Bibliographic;

http://www.natureasia.com/…/art…/10.1038/nmiddleeast.2015.18
http://www.sciencedirect.com/…/article/pii/S0370269314009381
http://www.abc.es/20101126/ciencia/primer-universo-liquido-201011261436.html
http://es.wikihow.com/calcular-el-porcentaje-de-masa
 Reaction on Water Ices(http://iopscience.iop.org/2041-8205/)
Scientific America, Sept. 1956. Vol 195.Pág. 82.
http://phys.org/news/2014-06-scientists-dip-mysterious-no-man.html#nRlv
http://actualidad.rt.com/ciencias/view/51975-gran-congelacion-nueva-alternativa-big-bang
http://news.discovery.com/space/do-we-live-in-a-spinning-universe-110708.htm
http://www.nature.com/news/cosmologist-claims-universe-may-not-be-expanding-1.1337





[i] http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tales_de_Mileto
[ii] Scientific America, Sept. 1956. Vol 195.Pág. 82.

[iii] http://www.natureasia.com/…/art…/10.1038/nmiddleeast.2015.18
http://www.sciencedirect.com/…/article/pii/S0370269314009381

[iv] Hannes Alfvén, Cosmology—Myth or Science? J Astrophysics and Astronomy, vol. 5, pp. 79-98, (1984).
[v] http://www.livescience.com/49958-theory-no-big-bang.html
[viii] http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/11/30/nasa-finds-water-ice-mercury_n_2216282.html
[ix] http://phys.org/news/2015-04-solar-awash.html
[x] http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2011/jul/25/was-the-universe-born-spinning
[xi]http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2015/150303/ncomms7390/full/ncomms7390.html
[xii] http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Materia_oscura
[xiii] http://rpc8abril.blogspot.com/
[xiv] http://www.nanowerk.com/nanotechnology-news/newsid=38955.php

[xix] http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fot%C3%B3lisis

martes, 30 de septiembre de 2014

Theory of the origin of the universe of water ice


Dark matter and dark energy is essentially a plasma of hydroxyl ions.

Author; Rogelio Pérez Casadiego

The scientific theory teaches us that; dark matter; hypothetical matter that does not emit sufficient electromagnetic radiation, but whose existence can be inferred from gravitational effects that cause in the visible matter.


The dark energy is a form of dark matter that would be present in the whole space, producing a pressure that tends to accelerate the expansion of the Universe, resulting in a repulsive gravitational force.



Is there some kind of matter in the universe that has these physical characteristics of the dark matter and dark energy, which teaches the scientific theory, which is not a theoretical matter?



Hannes Olof Gösta Alfvén (Swedish: [alˈveːn]; 30 May 1908 – 2 April 1995) was a Swedish electrical engineer, plasma physicist and winner of the 1970 Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on magnetohydrodynamics (MHD). He described the class of MHD waves now known as Alfvén waves.

In 1937, Alfvén argued that if plasma pervaded the universe, it could then carry electric currents capable of generating a galactic magnetic field.

After winning the Nobel Prize for his works in magnetohydrodynamics, he emphasized that:

In order to understand the phenomena in a certain plasma region, it is necessary to map not only the magnetic but also the electric field and the electric currents. Space is filled with a network of currents which transfer energy and momentum over large or very large distances. The currents often pinch to filamentary or surface currents. The latter are likely to give space, as also interstellar and intergalactic space, a cellular structure.[1]


Alfvén was often forced to publish his papers in obscure journals.



Alfvén recalled:
When I describe the [plasma phenomena] according to this formulism most referees do not understand what I say and turn down my papers. With the referee system which rules US science today, this means that my papers are rarely accepted by the leading US journals.[2]


By contrast the current scientific consensus is that about 96% of the total energy density in the universe is not plasma or any other form of ordinary matter, but a combination of cold dark matter and dark energy.


Plasma is loosely described as an electrically neutral medium of positive and negative particles (i.e. the overall charge of a plasma is roughly zero).

Plasmas are by far the most common phase of ordinary matter in the universe, both by mass and by volume. Essentially, all of the visible light from space comes from stars, which are plasmas with a temperature such that they radiate strongly at visible wavelengths. Most of the ordinary (or baryonic) matter in the universe, however, is found in the intergalactic medium, which is also a plasma, but much hotter, so that it radiates primarily as X-rays.

Alfvén waves (low frequency hydromagnetic plasma oscillations) are named in his honor. Many of his theories about the solar system were verified as late as the 1980s through external measurements of cometary and planetary magnetospheres. But Alfvén himself noted that astrophysical textbooks poorly represented known plasma phenomena:

A study of how a number of the most used textbooks in astrophysics treat important concepts such as double layers, critical velocity, pinch effects, and circuits is made. It is found that students using these textbooks remain essentially ignorant of even the existence of these concepts, despite the fact that some of them have been well known for half a century (e.g, double layers, Langmuir, 1929; pinch effect, Bennet, 1934).[3]
Alfvén reported that of 17 of the most used textbooks on astrophysics, none mention the pinch effect, none mentioned critical ionization velocity, only two mentioned circuits, and three mentioned double layers.

Alfvén believed the problem with the Big Bang was that astrophysicists tried to extrapolate the origin of the universe from mathematical theories developed on the blackboard, rather than starting from known observable phenomena. He also considered the Big Bang to be a scientific myth devised to explain creation.[4]


I think it will be very difficult to get a hypothetical matter (matter ideal), with hypothetical characteristics (ideal characteristics),respond to the mystery of the percentage by mass in the universe. My preference would be for a real material with real characterics.

But to be able to answer these questions you need to change the paradigm on the origin of the universe and this new theory has those answers:



Theory of the origin of the universe of water ice



Author; Rogelio Pérez Casadiego

"this theory teaches that the universe was originated from a water ice (The ice has the characteristic of having three spatial dimensions and once that we see today), in which suffers a physical process that causes a change, passing of state solid to gas, a process known as sublimation, causing space with three spatial dimensions and once and rotation of the mass in the universe forming a water fog, after the condensation of this gas turning to the liquid state, then in this liquid water presents a movement of rotation, which is increasing up to accelerate and to make rotate on its own axis (according to this theory is the cause by which all the matter in the universe rotates), which begins to radiate energy; this energy radiated in the beginning of the universe, generated very high temperatures (According to this theory is the thermal radiation (CMB)), changing this water mass into a gas which expands throughout whole universe(according to this theory is the expansion that the universe experiment in its origin), subsequently in the atoms of this radiated energy, the atoms begin a spontaneous emission due to the interaction with matter, and there begins this high energy to turn into photons, then this water gas is assaulted by the photons of high energy (rays gamma), and the water molecules are ionized by the absorption of light UV of high energy resulting in the loss of electrons from the molecules of water generating a vacuum in the midst of this water gas ( according to this theory is the vacuum of exterior space),  and matter was divided into 2 kinds of plasma; the first plasma, is formed by the molecule of (-OH),  these two atoms constitutes 95 %. Of the percentage of the universe and the second plasma is formed of the hydrogen atoms (+H) which constitutes 5 % of the percentage of the universe”


Keywords;
Expansion, inflation. Molecule of ion hydroxyl, ion hydrogen atoms. Gravitational Waves, water ice.

Introduction;

In this theoretical work is presented a different way of seeing the universe, based on a series of scientific arguments that go focused in that sense, being one of the main argument of this theory is to present a universe originated from something and not nothing, and also a new way to view the origin of the light in the universe.

The theory of relativity teaches that a mass that accelerates will have to radiate energy in the form of gravitational waves, these were generated according to the theory of relativity by a  mass accelerated, and the best candidate to accelerate and radiate energy, is the water because of their molecular combination the oxygen and the hydrogen, can be used as a raw material, to form all the elements of the earth and the universe, as explained by the Doctor William A. Fowleren in his writing the elements can be transmuted[i], moreover  the percentage of the mass of the water molecule, explains perfectly 100% of matter in the universe"

In the development of the background to this work were written and were cited verbatim paragraphs of current scientific research, which justify and reinforce this new way of viewing the universe, by which we can say that it is not an isolated idea of the researcher.

Scientific articles said; the start of the Universe should be modeled not as a Big Bang but more like water freezing into ice, according to a team of theoretical physicists at the University of Melbourne and RMIT University[ii].


This article presents a new theory on the origin of the universe, which explains that the universe originated of water ice, which after a physical process is passed to the gaseous state and then to the liquid state, and due to a movement of rotation in the water, experiment an acceleration in the mass of water up to make rotate on its own axis, radiating energy and ionizing their molecules causing an vacuum in the Middle this water gas, converting the water gas into two kinds of plasma.

In this theory teaches that this water body, from which all matter of the universe originates, experienced a rotation movement, and by acceleration up made it rotate on its own axis, currently the scientific have already proposed in their research:

“A left-handed and right-handed imprint on the sky as reportedly revealed by galaxy rotation would imply the universe was rotating from the very beginning and retained an overwhelmingly strong angular momentum. This could imply that the primeval Big Bang universe had rotation energy on a vast scale. Or at least there were powerful vorticies in the primeval fireball. The galaxy spin direction is fossil evidence from these vorticies. Likewise, the rotation and revolution of our solar system’s planets is a relic of the spinning gas and dust disk that encircled the newborn sun”, “This isn’t the first time astronomers claimed to have observed a carousel universe. The cosmic microwave background from the big bang had suspected anomalies that were once suggested as evidence of rotation, but were later dismissed as instrumental effects”[iv]

At present important theoretical physicists like the doctor Erik Verlinde, have declared themselves about the idea of the big explosion saying; "is illogical thinking that there was nothing and then it exploded.”I think we're going to find out that what we thought was the Big Bang was in fact another type of event".[v]

This hypothesis has antecedents in the old time the pre-socratic philosopher and scientist Thales of Miletus, this referred to the idea that everything was made of water, giving importance to the movement.

Another concept is on the expansion of the universe, there is currently a scientific explanation, which proposes another explanation of the expansion of the universe, which was published in the journal natural that refers to the expansion of the mass of the atoms.[vii]

To explain the acceleration of the expansion of the universe, astrophysicists have invoked dark energy – a hypothetical form of energy that permeates all of space. A popular theory of dark energy, however, does not fit new results on the value of the proton mass divided by the electron mass in the early universe, the professor of astronomy of the University of Arizona, Rodger Thompson finds that a popular alternative to Albert Einstein's theory for the acceleration of the expansion of the universe does not fit newly obtained data on a fundamental constant, the proton to electron mass ratio[viii].

Separately this theory teaches that the light in the universe, not spontaneously generated due to a big explosion, but that it originated gradually.

At the beginning, everything was darkness, until it reached the clarity as part of a process of "illumination" apparently progressive, not sudden, has said the prestigious astronomer Richard Ellis.[ix]

Today scientists know that there is a shortage of light and they say; It's as if you were in a brightly lit room, but to look around only 40 watt bulbs you saw," noted Juna Kollmeier, lead author of the study. "Where does all that light? Does not appear in our census"[x].

Materials and methods

The method to perform this research was the method analytical and synthetic, because the method of scientific evolution should be mixed, both for the discovery to science instruction, which is we use two species of method.

Results;

The universe was originated from a water ice (The ice has the characteristic of having three spatial dimensions and once that we see today), in which suffers a physical process that causes a change, passing of state solid to gas, a process known as sublimation, forming a water fog, after the condensation of this gas turning to the liquid state, then in this liquid water presents a movement of rotation, which is increasing up to accelerate and to make rotate on its own axis (according to this theory is the cause by which all the matter in the universe rotates), which begins to radiate energy, this energy radiated in the beginning of the universe, generated very high temperatures (According to this theory is the thermal radiation (CMB)), changing this water mass into a gas which expands throughout whole universe(according to this theory is the expansion that the universe experiment) in its origin, subsequently in the atoms of this radiated energy, the atoms begin a spontaneous emission due to the interaction with matter, and there begins this high energy to turn into photons, then this water gas is assaulted by the photons of high energy (rays gamma), and the water molecules are ionized by the absorption of light UV of high energy resulting in the loss of electrons from the molecules of water generating a vacuum in the midst of this water gas ( according to this theory is the vacuum of exterior space),  and matter was divided into 2 kinds of plasma; the first plasma, is formed by the molecule of (-OH),  these two atoms constitutes 95 %. Of the percentage of the universe and the second plasma is formed of the hydrogen atoms (+H) which constitutes 5 % of the percentage of the universe.



The first plasma composed of (-OH), was formed what we know today as the dark matter and dark energy, which constitutes 95% of the totality of the universe and which formed oceans, ice water and liquid water in the universe., And the second plasma (+H) was formed clouds, stars, galaxies and the rest of astronomical structures that at present are observed, that constitutes 5 % of the matter of the universe, and of vacuum in the middle of this gas, in which the exterior space originates.


We know that the light is produced in the external part that surrounds the nucleus of the atom where orbiting electrons, therefore when the atoms are energized their electrons move to electronic layers of higher energy. 

Now the electrons are unstable at high layers of higher energy, Thus they tend to fall lower energy levels, but the decay to lower level, the conservation of energy requires the emission of photons. Of the big radiated energy the atoms begin a spontaneous emission due to the excitation of the atoms and to the interaction with matter, that produces ionizing energy as gamma rays which ionizes the water gas, Then there take place collisions ión-electron  causing the x-rays emission, and the electromagnetic waves begin to dilate for a process known as emission of thermal braking, where the energy begins to turn into light, because the law of conservation of energy affirms that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, can only be changed from one form to another, 

This energy there is a waning by successive collisions between atoms, based in this principle, at that time between 365,000 and 380,000 years after this great acceleration appears the first ray of light visible of the light spectrum, the (purple color) with a wavelength of 380-450nm, the electromagnetic waves in the universe were dilated proportionally to the decay of the temperature  by successive collisions between those atoms, with time  by keeping the principle of conservation of energy, continues the dilation of the electromagnetic waves and appears the second light beam of the light spectrum color (blue), with a wavelength of 450 -495nm, in a similar manner the third color (green), with a wavelength of 495-570nm, then the fourth color (yellow) with a wavelength of 570-590nm, the fifth ray of light (orange ) ,with a wavelength of 590-620nm, and, finally appears the sixth ray (red light) 620-750nm wavelength, this light spectrum originates the white light and the universe cools.



Conclusions;

It is possible to conclude that the universe originated from something and not of nothing, so it can be said that the universe originated from an water ice, which after suffering different physical process originated a large mass of water, which began to experience a movement in it, that produces a big rotation of this water body on its own axis, as we see that most matter in the universe moves. and energy irradiation, this energy raised the temperature of this water up to turning into a gas that expand the whole universe, subsequently the atoms begin a spontaneous emission due to the excitation and to the interaction with matter, for the reason that of this appear gamma rays which ionize the molecules of water, experiencing an vacuum in the middle of this water gas, turning the matter into two plasma, one formed by atoms of (+ H) and other plasma formed by the molecule of (-OH). The plasmas (+H) constitutes 5% of the universe and of this was formed the clouds, stars, galaxies and all the astronomical structures that we observe, and the plasma (-OH) was formed what today we know as matter dark and dark energy that constitutes the other 95% of the universe and which formed oceans, ice water and liquid water in the universe..

Other one of the conclusions of this work, is that the light in the universe originated from progressive form, keeping the principle of conservation of the energy, is energy that radiated this mass of water, caused by the acceleration, is converted into light, because the atoms begin a spontaneous emission due to the interaction with matter s, turning into photons, and this energy turns little by little into light as the low energy due to the successive collisions between atom. Also I think that this principle is associated with the quantity of twinkles of gamma rays that occur in the universe.

Bibliographic;


1- Hannes, A (1990). "Cosmology in the Plasma Universe: An Introductory Exposition". IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 18: 5–10. Bibcode:1990ITPS...18....5P. doi:10.1109/27.45495. ISSN 0093-3813.

2- Hannes Alfvén, "Memoirs of a Dissident Scientist", American Scientist, Volume 76, No 3, May–June 1988, pp. 249–251. Quoted in Joseph Paul Martino, Science Funding: Politics and Porkbarrel 1992, Transaction Publishers, ISBN 15600003303
3-Hannes Alfvén, "Double layers and circuits in astrophysics" (1986) IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science (ISSN 0093-3813), vol. PS-14, Dec. 1986, p. 779-793.
4-Hannes Alfvén, Cosmology—Myth or Science? J Astrophysics and Astronomy, vol. 5, pp. 79-98, (1984).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannes_Alfv%C3%A9n
http://es.wikihow.com/calcular-el-porcentaje-de-masa
http://www.chem.ufl.edu/~itl/4411L_f00/OH/OH.html
OH Emission
Scientific America, Sept. 1956. Vol 195.Pág. 82.
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/mar/17/primordial-gravitational-wave-discovery-physics-bicep
http://phys.org/news/2014-06-scientists-dip-mysterious-no-man.html#nRlv
http://phys.org/news/2013-07-liquid-liquid-phase-transition-low-temperature.html#inlRlv
http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/newsandeventspggrp/imperialcollege/newssummary/news_22-3-2013-17-53-51
http://www.seti.cl/algo-anda-bien-con-en-el-universo-calculos-cosmicos-revelan-una-crisis-de-luz-faltante/
http://actualidad.rt.com/ciencias/view/51975-gran-congelacion-nueva-alternativa-big-bang
http://news.discovery.com/space/do-we-live-in-a-spinning-universe-110708.htm
http://phys.org/news/2013-01-dark-energy-alternatives-einstein-room.html#nRl




[i] Scientific America, Sept. 1956. Vol 195.Pág. 82.

[ii] http://www.kurzweilai.net/big-bang-or-big-chill-the-quantum-graphity-theory
[iii] http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/mar/17/primordial-gravitational-wave-discovery-physics-bicep

[iv] http://news.discovery.com/space/do-we-live-in-a-spinning-universe-110708.htm
[vi] http://www.caosyciencia.com/ideas/articulo.php?id=121104
[viii] http://phys.org/news/2013-01-dark-energy-alternatives-einstein-room.html#nRl

[ix] http://www.lavanguardia.com/ciencia/20131029/54392836954/luz-universo-aparecio-forma-progresiva.html#ixzz2jQRYkxdv